Mosby v. Cunix Automotive Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Ernest Mosby and Ernest Mosby, Jr.
Defendant: Cunix Automotive Group, LLC and Cunix Automotive Group, LLC doing business as The Toy Barn
Case Number: 2:2020cv05867
Filed: November 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Referring Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2023 ***Civil Case Terminated. (ds)
January 10, 2023 Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Defendant Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (Griffith, Kevin)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER - Status Report due by 1/20/2023. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 1/6/23. (ds)
March 21, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE: Counsel shall confer and notify the Court at #ADR@ohsd.uscourts.gov within 10 days if this case should NOT proceed with mediation in May 2022. If the case should not proceed, counsel shall indicate whether the case should be continued to another month and, if so, which one. Deadline for notifying the court is 4:00pm on 3/31/2022. (kk2)In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the parties and mediators are ENCOURAGED to attempt mediation via telephone or video conference.
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/16/21. (jr)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: The October 19, 2021 Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED. Initial Disclosures due by 12/1/2021; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 12/15/2021; Discovery due by 9/23/2022; Protective Order or Clawback Agreement due by 12/15/2021; Dispositive motions due by 11/18/2022; Primary Expert due by 7/22/2022; Rebuttal Expert due by 8/19/2022; Settlement Demand due by 1/21/2022; Response to Settlement Demand due by 2/4/2022; Case is referred to Mediation in 5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/13/2021. (kk2)
October 11, 2021 Filing 13 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Ernest Mosby, Jr. (Wido, Christopher)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTATION ORDER granting 11 Motion to Continue. Pretrial Conference reset for 10/19/2021 11:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/21/21. (jr)
September 21, 2021 Filing 11 Paperless MOTION to Continue Pretrial Conference by Defendant Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (jr)
September 16, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2021 11:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
June 21, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Jay Klaben-Finegold for Defendant Cunix Automotive Group, LLC (Klaben-Finegold, Andrew)
May 3, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (Griffith, Kevin)
May 3, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (Griffith, Kevin)
March 9, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Cunix Automotive Group, LLC on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Wido, Christopher)
December 23, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (er)
November 19, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (er)
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cunix Automotive Group, LLC. (mdr)
November 12, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Ernest Mosby. (Wido, Christopher) Modified text on 11/16/2020 (mdr).
November 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7751608), filed by Ernest Mosby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Wido, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosby v. Cunix Automotive Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernest Mosby
Represented By: Christopher Wido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernest Mosby, Jr.
Represented By: Christopher Wido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cunix Automotive Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cunix Automotive Group, LLC doing business as The Toy Barn
Represented By: Kevin Edmund Griffith
Represented By: Andrew Jay Klaben-Finegold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?