Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
| Thomas E. Smith, Jr. |
| Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution |
| 2:2020cv05915 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| James L Graham |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER issued CONSOLIDATING this case with 2:20-cv-5830. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 12/11/20. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 6
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas E. Smith, Jr. (er)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner indicates that he has filed grievances in the prison system and motion(s) for judicial release. He also refers to the absence of any state corrective process for relief. The Court is unable to determine whether Petitioner has exhausted available remedies as to his claims. Respondent is ORDERED to file a Response within twenty-one (21) days addressing the issue of exhaustion, whether Petitioner has exhausted state remedies as to his claims, and the appropriate manner by which he must do so. Petitioner may file a reply within fourteen (14) days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/9/2020. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 4
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Thomas E Smith, Jr. as to 1:20-cv-904, doc. 4, Related Case Memorandum Order, returned. Document has been resent with addressee's correct ID number. (kl)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring case to the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 11/16/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Case transferred in from the Western Division (Cincinnati) on 11/16/2020, Case Number 1:20-cv-904. Case assigned to Judge James L. Graham and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (km)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Thomas E. Smith, Jr. (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents.) (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (ew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas E. Smith, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
