Kulp v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security et al
Plaintiff: Cheryl L Kulp
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2020cv06188
Filed: December 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 3/8/2021. by Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Lewis, Ameenah)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 12/28/20. (ds)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Lewis, Ameenah)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ameenah Lewis for Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (Lewis, Ameenah)
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answer due 2/5/2021. (mdr)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within sixty (60) days after filing of the Social Security Identification Form, which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff's Statement of Errors due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Commissioner's response due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Plaintiff may reply fifteen (15) days thereafter. If all parties consent to disposition of this case by the Magistrate Judge, parties should file their consents within thirty (30) days after service of the Administrative Record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 12/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent Form) (daf)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 8.1(a), Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Social Security Identification Form to effect service on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 12/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Social Security Identification Form) (daf)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-7816821), filed by Cheryl L Kulp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Commissioner Region V, #3 Summons Form Columbus) (Jackson, Nathaniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kulp v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Represented By: Ameenah Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl L Kulp
Represented By: Nathaniel Warren Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?