Bailey v. Houk et al
Michael K Bailey |
Marc Houk and Kathleen Kovach |
2:2021cv00488 |
February 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
James L Graham |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Marc Houk, Kathleen Kovach. (daf) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Marc Houk, and Kathleen Kovach, filed by Michael K Bailey. (daf) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff be allowed to prosecute his action without prepayment of fees or costs and that judicial officers who render services in this action shall do so as if the costs had been prepaid. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to effect service of process by certified mail. Each Defendant is ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within 45 days after being served with a copy of the complaint and summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/3/2021. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Michael K Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons and Marshal forms, #4 Envelope) (mdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.