Trost v. Hotchkiss et al
| john "jack" trost |
| kirk immens and Kenneth hotchkiss |
| 2:2021cv00578 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| James L Graham |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 4/23/2021; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 4/23/2021; Primary Expert due by 10/30/2021; Rebuttal Expert due by 12/15/2021; Discovery (Fact) due by 10/29/2021; Dispositive motions due by 11/30/2021; Settlement Demand due by 4/23/2021; Response to Settlement Demand due by 6/4/2021; Case is referred to Mediation in 11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/7/2021. (kk2)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff John "Jack" Trost. (Swisher, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Kenneth Hotchkiss, Kirk Immens. (Borla, Robert)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to All Defendants. Answers Due: 04/12/2021. (Borla, Robert) Modified text to include Answer date on 2/24/2021 (mdr).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Plaintiff John "Jack" Trost Civil Cover Sheet (Swisher, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8097883), filed by john "jack" trost. (Swisher, Zachary)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
