Putney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
| Lester Putney |
| E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company |
| 2:2021cv00602 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (daf) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Plaintiff Lester Putney. (Schulte, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of West Virginia Southern; Case Number 2:20-cv-00874. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers added. (daf) |
| Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-121) JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL: certified copy from the Southern District of Ohio transferring this action to the USDC/SDOH for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 2/5/2021. (cc: attys) (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION FROM JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION re: Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-121), MDL 2433. (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7839881. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 2/10/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Putney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lester Putney | |
| Represented By: | Richard W Schulte |
| Represented By: | Clayton J. Fitzsimmons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
