LE et al v. Renaud et al
TOAN B DIEP, HAU B DIEP and Thao T LE |
Field Office Directo Stephanie Reither and Tracy Renaud |
2:2021cv00852 |
February 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Algenon L Marbley |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTATION ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Eli Echols as co-counsel. Co-counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on March 3, 2021. (jlk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Stephanie Reither, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jlk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8172633) of Eli Echols by Plaintiffs HAU B DIEP, TOAN B DIEP, Thao T LE. (Nimer, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: BOHSDC-8169910), filed by Thao T LE, TOAN B DIEP, HAU B DIEP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J) (Nimer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.