Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc et al v. Seawend, Ltd. et al
| SMS Holdings Corporation and Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc |
| Seawend, Ltd., J. David Karam, Cedar Enterprises, Inc. and James M Karam |
| 2:2021cv01134 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Michael H Watson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Cedar Enterprises, Inc. answer due 6/4/2021; J. David Karam answer due 6/4/2021; James M Karam answer due 6/4/2021; Seawend, Ltd. answer due 6/4/2021. (er)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATION to Extend Time to Move or Plead by Defendants Cedar Enterprises, Inc., J. David Karam, James M Karam, Seawend, Ltd.. (Young, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTATION ORDER granting #6 and #7 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kevin C. Baltz and Valerie Diden Moore as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/13/2021. (ew)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE by Plaintiffs Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation re #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8254960) of Valerie Diden Moore Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Tennessee (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE by Plaintiffs Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8254931) of Kevin C. Baltz Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Tennessee (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Deficiency re: #6 and #7 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kevin C. Baltz and Valerie Diden Moore. The submitted certificate is not from the highest court of a State. Deficiency Deadline by 4/22/2021. (ew)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8254960) of Valerie Diden Moore by Plaintiffs Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation. (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8254931) of Kevin C. Baltz by Plaintiffs Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation. (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy S. Young and Stephen D. Jones for Defendants Cedar Enterprises, Inc., J. David Karam, James M Karam, Seawend, Ltd. (Young, Jeremy) Modified text on 3/31/2021 (ew).
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff SMS Holdings Corporation. (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc. identifying Other Affiliates WTC Ventures, Inc. and SMS Holdings Corporation. (Carpenter, Michael) Modified text on 3/17/2021 (ew).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Plaintiffs Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet (Carpenter, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8219921), filed by Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc, SMS Holdings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Carpenter, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
