Annett v. Autovin, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ed Annett
Defendant: Autovin, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv01206
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: The May 12, 2021 preliminary pretrial conference is VACATED. Initial Disclosures due by 5/26/2021; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 5/31/2021; Primary Expert due by 11/1/2021; Rebuttal Expert due by 12/1/2021; Discovery (Fact) due by 11/30/2021; Dispositive motions due by 1/14/2022; Settlement Demand due by 6/25/2021; Response to Settlement Demand due by 7/23/2021; Case is referred to Mediation in 11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/7/2021. (kk2)
May 5, 2021 Filing 10 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Autovin, Inc. & Plaintiff Ed Annett (Mounts, Benjamin) Modified parties on 5/5/2021 (kk2)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTATION ORDER granting #7 & #8 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig Borowski and Sarah Fox as co-counsel. Co-counsels are directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/4/0021. (kk2)
May 4, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8295947) of Sarah Fox by Defendant Autovin, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mounts, Benjamin)
May 4, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8295885) of Craig Borowski by Defendant Autovin, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mounts, Benjamin)
April 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference set for 5/12/2021 11:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm)
April 15, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Autovin, Inc. (Mounts, Benjamin)
April 1, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Autovin, Inc. served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return) (kk2)
March 25, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (er)
March 23, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Autovin, Inc. (kk2)
March 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Autovin, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8228971), filed by Ed Annett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Moyle, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Annett v. Autovin, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ed Annett
Represented By: Jeffrey Joseph Moyle
Represented By: Christopher James Lalak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Autovin, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin W. Mounts
Represented By: Sarah Alexandra Fox
Represented By: Craig Matthew Borowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?