Harris v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
Plaintiff: Mason Harris
Defendant: Bureau Chief of the Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement - Ohio Department of Youth Services and Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Case Number: 2:2021cv01401
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2021 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis & recommending that Plaintiff's #4 Complaint be DISMISSED. Plaintiff must pay the entire filing fee w/in thirty (30) days. Objections to R&R due by 5/28/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/14/2021. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
May 14, 2021 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Bureau Chief of the Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement - Ohio Department of Youth Services and Ohio Adult Parole Authority filed by Mason Harris (kk2)
May 14, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: Deficiency Deadline re filing fee due by 6/13/2021 per #5 (Report and Recommendation) (kk2)
April 26, 2021 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mason Harris (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kk2)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTATION ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1 ) does not include a prison trust fund account statement from the prison cashier as required. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to amend his motion to include that account statement within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/1/21. (jr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 30, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: copies of the complaint for service and completed summons and USM-285 forms for each defendant) by Plaintiff Mason Harris (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of Appeal, #3 Envelope) (kk2)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mason Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau Chief of the Office of Quality Assurance and Improvement - Ohio Department of Youth Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?