Rife v. Adena Health System
| Amy Rife |
| Adena Health System |
| 2:2021cv02451 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Complaint of Plaintiff Amy Rife filed by Adena Health System. (Rose, Sara) |
Filing 10
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: The June 17, 2021 preliminary pretrial conference is VACATED. Joinder of Parties due by 7/22/2021. Motions to Amend due by 7/22/2021. Initial Disclosures due by 7/12/2021. Discovery due by 1/24/2022. Dispositive motions due by 2/28/2022. Response to Settlement Demand due by 7/22/2021. Mediation Deadline: 12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 6/15/2021. (daf) Modified on 6/16/2021 to correct response to settlement demand (kk2)
|
| Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Amy Rife & Defendant Adena Health System (Breedlove, Trisha) Modified parties on 6/14/2021 (kk2) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference set for 6/17/2021 01:00 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm) |
|
Filing 7
NOTATION ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint by 7/12/2021. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/19/2021. (agm)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Adena Health System. New date requested 7/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Hartman, Heidi) Modified on 5/19/2021 (kk2) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Adena Health System on 5/13/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Breedlove, Trisha) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal: Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Adena Health System (Hartman, Heidi) Modified on 5/13/2021 (kk2) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND filed in Ross County Common Pleas Court by Amy Rife against Adena Health System (kk2) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Adena Health System (Hartman, Heidi) Modified on 5/13/2021 (kk2) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Common Pleas Court of Ross County, Ohio, case number 21-CI-000092 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8309295), filed by Adena Health System. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hartman, Heidi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rife v. Adena Health System | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adena Health System | |
| Represented By: | Heidi N Hartman |
| Represented By: | Sara L Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Rife | |
| Represented By: | Trisha M. Breedlove |
| Represented By: | Paul Filippelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
