Sinomax USA, Inc. v. American Signature, Inc.
| Sinomax USA, Inc. |
| American Signature Inc |
| 2:2021cv03925 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/7/21. (jr)
|
|
Filing 21
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 8/17/2021; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 12/15/2021; Discovery due by 8/31/2022; Protective Order or Clawback Agreement due by 9/10/2021; Dispositive motions due by 9/30/2022; Primary Expert due by 6/1/2022; Rebuttal Expert due by 8/1/2022; Settlement Demand due by 9/13/2021; Response to Settlement Demand due fifteen (15) days thereafter; Case is referred to Mediation in 3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/12/2021. (kk2)
|
|
Filing 20
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 8/12/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing 19
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Sinomax USA, Inc.. (Reid, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 8/12/2021 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTATION ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of James P. Berg as co-counsel; granting #16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Diane C. Ragosa co-counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on July 28, 2021. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8415812) of Diane C. Ragosa by Plaintiff Sinomax USA, Inc.. (Reid, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8415790) of James P. Berg by Plaintiff Sinomax USA, Inc.. (Reid, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Nelson Marlin Reid for Plaintiff Sinomax USA, Inc. (Reid, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses filed by American Signature Inc. (Little, Marion)
|
|
Filing 12
Case transferred in from District of New Jersey; Case Number 2:21-cv-11483. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson added. (er)
|
|
***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #10 Consent Order. (ams, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER terminating #6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. In light of D.E. 10, D.E. 6 is terminated as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 6/28/21.(TAD) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT ORDER Transferring Case to the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 6/28/2021. (ams, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Order Transferring Case to the USDC, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division by AMERICAN SIGNATURE, INC.. (WRIGHT, ROBERT) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by ROBERT WRIGHT on behalf of AMERICAN SIGNATURE, INC. (WRIGHT, ROBERT) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Motion set for 7/19/2021 before Judge Susan D. Wigenton. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMERICAN SIGNATURE, INC. identifying american signature as Corporate Parent.. (NAZIR, ZAARA) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by AMERICAN SIGNATURE, INC.. Responses due by 7/6/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Certification, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Statement 7.1 Corporate Disclosure)(NAZIR, ZAARA) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by SINOMAX USA, INC.. All Plaintiffs. (RAGOSA, DIANE) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to AMERICAN SIGNATURE, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (ams, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sinomax USA, Inc.. (RAGOSA, DIANE) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12476393) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Sinomax USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark)(RAGOSA, DIANE) [Transferred from New Jersey on 7/12/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
