Pyfrom v. ContactUS, LLC et al
| Khadeza Pyfrom |
| ContactUS, LLC and ContactUS Technology, Ltd |
| 2:2021cv04293 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to All Defendants. (Coffman, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE by Plaintiff Khadeza Pyfrom of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join) (Contreras, Peter)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Plaintiff Khadeza Pyfrom of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join) (Contreras, Peter)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Plaintiff Khadeza Pyfrom of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join) (Contreras, Peter)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Plaintiff Khadeza Pyfrom of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consents to Join) (Contreras, Peter)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Plaintiff Khadeza Pyfrom of Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join) (Coffman, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8476860), filed by Khadeza Pyfrom. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Coffman, Matthew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
