Jeffers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Crystal E. Jeffers |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2021cv04861 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Algenon L Marbley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 12/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Developments, #6 Disability Related Developments, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2) (Stark, John) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ameenah Lewis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Lewis, Ameenah) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Crystal E. Jeffers. (jlk) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. In accordance with the Magistrate Judges General Order Concerning Social Security Appeals (S.D. Ohio E.D. January 1, 2016) and Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1, the Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within sixty (60) days after filing of the Social Security Identification Form and the Complaint required by Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1(a), which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff must file a Statement of Errors within forty-five (45) days after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. The Commissioner must file and serve a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Statement of Errors within forty-five (45) days after service of the Statement of Errors. Plaintiff's Reply, if any, must be filed fifteen (15) days later. All briefing must include references to the administrative record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 1, 2021. (jlk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2021: #1 consent) (jlk). |
SERVICE Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/1/2021, answer due 11/30/2021. (jlk) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Crystal E. Jeffers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Farrell, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jeffers v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Crystal E. Jeffers | |
Represented By: | Clifford Michael Farrell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | John J. Stark |
Represented By: | Ameenah Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.