Czarnecki et al v. The Kingland Company Ltd et al
Plaintiff: SHANNON CZARNECKI and KENNETH CZARNECKI
Defendant: THE KINGLAND COMPANY, LTD, CROSBY COMPANY, LTD, MARK M. CROSBY, ANTOINETTE M. CROSBY, The Kingland Company Ltd and Crosby Company Ltd
Case Number: 2:2021cv05031
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2022 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Antoinette M. Crosby, Mark M. Crosby, Crosby Company Ltd, and The Kingland Company Ltd answers due 12/28/2021 per #8 (Stipulation) (kk2)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION of Extension of time to move or plead by Defendants Antoinette M. Crosby, Mark M. Crosby, Crosby Company Ltd, The Kingland Company Ltd. & All Plaintiffs (Stankunas, Jeffrey) Modified on 12/7/2021 to correct text and filing parties (kk2)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Crosby Company Ltd served on 11/19/2021, answer due 12/10/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return) (kk2)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed (Not Effectuated related to COVID19): Mark M. Crosby served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return C-19 1203) (kk2)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Antoinette M. Crosby served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return) (kk2)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Mailing By Clerk: Summons & Complaint sent by certified mail to Antoinette M. Crosby, Mark M. Crosby, Crosby Company Ltd, and The Kingland Company Ltd. (kk2)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF NON-ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio re The Kingland Company Ltd. Statutory Agent: The summons is not directed to the defendant (Attachments: #1 Summons Form) (kk2)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Antoinette M. Crosby, Mark M. Crosby, Crosby Company Ltd, and The Kingland Company Ltd. (kk2)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8540465), filed by Shannon Czarnecki, Kenneth Czarbecki. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Exhibit Consent to Sue, #4 Exhibit Consent to Sue) (Wido, Christopher) Modified party names on 10/14/2021 (kk2)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Czarnecki et al v. The Kingland Company Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANNON CZARNECKI
Represented By: Christopher Wido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENNETH CZARNECKI
Represented By: Christopher Wido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE KINGLAND COMPANY, LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CROSBY COMPANY, LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK M. CROSBY
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Stankunas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTOINETTE M. CROSBY
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Stankunas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kingland Company Ltd
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Stankunas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crosby Company Ltd
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Stankunas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?