McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Debra L. McKinney |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2021cv05074 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 1/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 1, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 2, #4 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 3, #5 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 4, #6 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 5, #7 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 6, #8 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 7, #9 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 8, #10 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 9, #11 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 10, #12 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 11, #13 Documents Related to Administrative Process Part 12, #14 Payment Documents and Decisions, #15 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #16 Non Disability Related Developments, #17 Disability Related Developments, #18 Medical Records Part 1, #19 Medical Records Part 2, #20 Medical Records Part 3) (Stark, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Susana Ochoa for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Ochoa, Susana) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Debra L. McKinney (kk2) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Certified administrative record due sixty (60) days after filing of the Complaint and SS Identification Form; Plaintiff's statement of errors due forty-five (45) days after filing of the administrative record; Defendant's response in opposition due forty-five (45) days after service of the Statement of Errors; Plaintiff may reply fifteen (15) days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent Form) (kk2)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 12/20/2021 (kk2) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Debra L. McKinney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Farrell, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra L. McKinney | |
| Represented By: | Clifford Michael Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Represented By: | Susana Ochoa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
