Thomas v. Candid Care Co.
| Kevin Thomas |
| Candid Care Co. |
| 2:2021cv05472 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER granting #10 Motion for leave to appear pro hac vice of Christopher D. Kratovil as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. By Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/21/2022. (daf)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE by Defendant Candid Care Co. re #10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8675188) of Christopher D. Kratovil Certificate of Good Standing of Christopher Kratovil (Miller, Robin)
|
|
Filing 12
Notice of Deficiency re: The submitted certificate is not from the highest court of a State. Related Document: #10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8675188) of Christopher D. Kratovil filed by Candid Care Co.. Deficiency Deadline by 2/2/2022. (daf)
|
|
Filing 11
Defendant's Original Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Candid Care Co.. (Miller, Robin)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8675188) of Christopher D. Kratovil by Defendant Candid Care Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Proposed Order) (Miller, Robin)
|
|
NOTATION ORDER granting #8 and #9 Motions for leave to appear pro hac vice of Donna K. McElroy and Katherine A. Zampas as Co-Counsels. Co-Counsels are directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. By Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/14/2022. (daf)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8673256) of Katherine Zampas by Defendant Candid Care Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Ex B Proposed Order) (Miller, Robin)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8673193) of by Defendant Candid Care Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Certificate of Good Standing) (Miller, Robin)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 2/9/2022 11:15 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Candid Care Co. answer due 1/14/2022. (daf)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Defendant Candid Care Co.. (Miller, Robin)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Candid Care Co.. The named defendant was served on 12/9/2021, answer due 12/30/2021. (daf)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Plaintiff Kevin Thomas of Filing Consent to Join Forms Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Forms) (Moyle, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (daf)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Candid Care Co.. (daf)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Candid Care Co. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8608463), filed by Kevin Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form) (Moyle, Jeffrey)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
