Graham v. Zekelman Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gregory Graham
Defendant: Zekelman Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv05484
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 11 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Zekelman Industries, Inc. & Plaintiff Gregory Graham. (Quan, Amanda) Modified filing parties on 1/20/2022 (kk2)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTATION ORDER granting #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - Zekelman Industries, Inc. answer due 1/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/18/22. (jr) Modified text on 1/18/2022 (kk2)
January 14, 2022 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Zekelman Industries, Inc. New date requested 1/31/2022. (Quan, Amanda) Modified text on 1/18/2022 (kk2)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTATION ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Patrick F Hulla as co-counsel. Co-counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/6/2022. (kk2)
January 5, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8660710) of Patrick F. Hulla by Defendant Zekelman Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Quan, Amanda)
January 3, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 1/26/2022 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
December 27, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Patrick F Hulla by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio (kk2)
December 23, 2021 Filing 4 STIPULATION for Leave to Plead by Defendant Zekelman Industries, Inc. & Plaintiff Gregory Graham (Quan, Amanda) Modified on 12/27/2021 to correct text and filing parties (kk2)
December 6, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing By Clerk: Summons and Complaint sent by certified mail to Zekelman Industries, Inc. (kk2)
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Zekelman Industries, Inc. (kk2)
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Zekelman Industries, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8609687), filed by Gregory Graham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form) (Moyle, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Zekelman Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Graham
Represented By: Jeffrey Joseph Moyle
Represented By: Hans A Nilges
Represented By: Shannon Marie Draher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zekelman Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Tiffany Quan
Represented By: Alexandria Ann Gardella
Represented By: Patrick F. Hulla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?