Jabbar v. Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel et al
| Hakimah Jabbar, r |
| Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel and Judge Michael Watson |
| 2:2021cv05571 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE and DENYING Defendants' Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer #2 as MOOT. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 1/26/2022. (tb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS filed originally in the Supreme Court of Ohio on 11/12/2021 by Hakimah Jabbar, r against Judge Michael Watson & Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel. (er) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Defendants Judge Michael Watson, Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel NOTICE OF APPLICABLE PREFILING RESTRICTIONS AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD (Horwitz, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of Ohio, case number 2021-1386, filed by Judge Michael Watson, Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supp. Cover Sheet) (Horwitz, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
