Conley v. The Kroger Company
Plaintiff: Jennifer Conley
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv05642
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Granting re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Kroger Company answer due 2/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 1/24/2022. (sln)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 2/22/2022. by Defendant The Kroger Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Murch, Kevin)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTATION ORDER granting #5 , #6 & #7 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Ronald A. Marron, Michael T. Houchin, and David Elliot. PHV Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 1/7/2022. (er)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin L Murch for Defendant The Kroger Company (Murch, Kevin)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE by Plaintiff Jennifer Conley re #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652910) of David Elliot, #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652902) of Michael Houchin, #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652897) of Ronald A. Marron, #8 Notice of Deficiency (Clerk's Notice), Notice of Filing of Corrected Certificates of Good Standing to Supplement Pending Pro Hac Vice Motions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Ronald A. Marron, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Michael T. Houchin, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing David Elliot) (Bartela, Frank)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: The Kroger Company answer due 2/1/2022. (er)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Defendant The Kroger Company. (Murch, Kevin)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Deficiency re 3 PHV motions: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Ronald A. Marron, #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Michael Houchin and #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David Elliot. The submitted certificates is not from the highest court of a State. Deficiency Deadline by 1/13/2022. (er)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652910) of David Elliot by Plaintiff Jennifer Conley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bartela, Frank)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652902) of Michael Houchin by Plaintiff Jennifer Conley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bartela, Frank)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8652897) of Ronald A. Marron by Plaintiff Jennifer Conley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bartela, Frank)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: The Kroger Company served on 12/21/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (er)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (er)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Kroger Company. (er)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Kroger Company, filed by Jennifer Conley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Receipt, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form Summons) (Bartela, Frank) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/8/2021- counsel's signature was missing from the complaint. The Clerk notified counsel of the issue and counsel provided Clerk with the corrected pages.) (er).
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee for cv action: $ 402.00, receipt number AOHSDC-8627857. (er)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conley v. The Kroger Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Conley
Represented By: Frank A. Bartela
Represented By: Nicole T Fiorelli
Represented By: Patrick J Perotti
Represented By: David Elliot
Represented By: Michael Houchin
Represented By: Ronald A. Marron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Represented By: Kevin L Murch
Represented By: Sarah Crabtree Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?