Wright v. Warden
Ramone L Wright |
Warden and Warden, FCI Coleman |
2:2021cv05698 |
December 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Algenon L Marbley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PAPERLESS USCA CASE NUMBER 22-3094: Second Successive Motion Docketed with the Sixth Circuit; case manager Ryan Orme. (er) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The instant petition is Wright's fourth challenge to his federal criminal sentence. Accordingly, this case is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to determine whether Wright may proceed in this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/28/2022. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification) |
***Civil Case Terminated - transferred to USCA 6th Circuit (kk2) |
Filing fee for habeas case: $ 5.00, receipt number 166417. (er) |
Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency re: Requires a filing fee or motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiency Deadline by 1/12/2022. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ramone L Wright. (Attachments: #1 Env.) (jlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.