Strzalkowski v. Mary Ann Township
| Phillip Strzalkowski |
| Mary Ann Township |
| 2:2022cv00156 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 3/16/2022; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 3/31/2022; Protective Order or Clawback Agreement due by 4/29/2022; Cross Dispositive motions due by 6/3/2022 - Responses in Opposition due by 6/24/2022 - Replies in Support due by 7/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/17/2022. (kk2)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 3/17/2022. (jr)
|
|
Filing 10
Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Mary Ann Township. (Lindemann, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 8
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Phillip Strzalkowski. (Nilges, Hans)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTATION ORDER: The joint Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #5 ) is GRANTED. Defendant now has until March 16, 2022, to answer, move, or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint (Doc. #1 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/23/22. (jr)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 3/17/2022 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint New date requested 3/16/2022. by Defendant Mary Ann Township. (Lindemann, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Mary Ann Township. Mary Ann Township served on 2/2/2022, answer due 2/23/2022. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: The Clerk of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint via certified mail on January 28, 2022, to the following Defendant: Mary Ann Township, 11152 Wilkins Run Road, NE, Newark, Ohio 43055, 7021 2720 0001 9499 8537. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Mary Ann Township. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Mary Ann Township ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8677814), filed by Phillip Strzalkowski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Nilges, Hans)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strzalkowski v. Mary Ann Township | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Strzalkowski | |
| Represented By: | Hans A Nilges |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mary Ann Township | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey N Lindemann |
| Represented By: | Alexander Lee Ewing |
| Represented By: | Jesse Jay Phillip Shamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
