Preserve Partners, Inc. v. Sawmill Park Properties, LLC
Preserve Partners, Inc. |
Sawmill Park Properties, LLC |
2:2022cv00477 |
February 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Michael H Watson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTATION ORDER denying without prejudice #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Emily Warren; denying as moot without prejudice #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/7/2022. (agm) |
Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sawmill Park Properties, LLC, filed by Preserve Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - the Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Letter) (St. Cyr, Emily) |
Filing 17 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 5/13/2022. Motions to Amend due by 5/13/2022. Initial Disclosures due by 4/1/2022. Discovery due by 9/16/2022. Dispositive motions due by 10/19/2022. Primary Expert due by 6/17/2022. Rebuttal Expert due by 7/15/2022. Settlement Demand due by 4/29/2022. Response to Settlement Demand due by 5/13/2022. Mediation Deadline: 6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 3/24/2022. (daf) |
Statistical Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 3/24/2022. (agm) |
Filing 16 NOTATION ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jason Yert. PHV Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 03/18/2022. (vb) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 162130) of Jason Yert by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 14 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Preserve Partners, Inc.. (St. Cyr, Emily) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily E. St. Cyr for Plaintiff Preserve Partners, Inc. (St. Cyr, Emily) |
Filing 10 Notice of Deficiency re: The submitted certificate is not from the highest court of a State. Related Document: #7 & #8 MOTIONS for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. Deficiency Deadline by 3/22/2022. (er) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference set for 3/24/2022 12:30 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8754192) of Emily Warren by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8754192) of Jason Yert by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 5 NOTATION ORDER granting #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #4 Complaint. Sawmill Park Properties, LLC answer due 3/16/2022. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 2/11/2022. (agm) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Sawmill Park Properties, LLC, filed by Preserve Partners, Inc.. (agm) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/14/2022- the document is now in searchable format) (er). |
Filing 3 First MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 3/16/2022. by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Winchester, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, case number 22cv-01-88 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8711971), filed by Sawmill Park Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Franklin County filings, #2 Exhibit Declaration) (Winchester, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Preserve Partners, Inc. v. Sawmill Park Properties, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Preserve Partners, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kara Marie Mundy |
Represented By: | Emily E. St. Cyr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sawmill Park Properties, LLC | |
Represented By: | Brian T Winchester |
Represented By: | Jason C. Yert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.