Williams v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Quinton Williams
Defendant: Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. and Craig Siegel
Case Number: 2:2022cv00554
Filed: February 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (er)
March 24, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Craig Siegel. (er)
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Hayden, Megan)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Striking ECF No. #5 Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a)(1) filed by Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. The Defendant is DIRECTED to cease filing discovery documents, or notices of their service, until they are used in a proceeding or the Court orders otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 03/11/2022. (tla)
March 9, 2022 Filing 5 STRICKEN per order ECF No #6 *** NOTICE by Defendant Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. of Service of Initial Disclosures Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a)(1) (Dodoo, Samuel) Modified text on 3/11/2022 (tla).
February 17, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.. (Dodoo, Samuel)
February 11, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed originally with Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts by Quinton Williams against Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. & Craig Siegel. (er)
February 10, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.. (Dodoo, Samuel)
February 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, case number 22CV000260 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: COHSDC-8718315), filed by Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summonses and Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Docket Print Out, #3 Exhibit C - Kentucky Secretary of State Print Out, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Dodoo, Samuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quinton Williams
Represented By: Megan R. Hayden
Represented By: Terry Van Hummel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.
Represented By: Samuel N. Dodoo
Represented By: Joseph W Pappalardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?