Moore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
| Melissa Moore and Jonathan Moore |
| Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00744 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Short Form ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc.. (Kloss, William) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Jonathan Moore, Melissa Moore. . (Fantini, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Moore, Melissa Moore., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Moore, Melissa Moore. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 2/22/2022. (daf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8728521), filed by Melissa Moore, Jonathan Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fantini, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
