Heath v. Baldauf et al
Shawnelle Heath and Shawntelle Heath |
Warden Teri Baldauf and LT.. Kramer |
2:2022cv01186 |
March 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Edmund A Sargus |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Shawntelle Heath as to re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 NEF stating ECF No. 3 was filed) (daf) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shawntelle Heath. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER issued re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shawntelle Heath. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff pay $402 ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee) or submit to the Court a certified copy of Plaintiffs prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-month period within thirty (30) days of the date of this Deficiency Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/7/22. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shawnelle Heath. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.