Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc. v. Foam Supplies, Inc. et al
| Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc. |
| Foam Supplies, Inc. and James Underwood |
| 2:2022cv01477 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE by Plaintiff Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures (Dortch, Michael)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE by Defendant Foam Supplies, Inc. re #13 MOTION for Leave to File a Surreply Instanter Proposed Order (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 14
REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Defendant Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Leave to File a Surreply Instanter by Defendant Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc.. (Dortch, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Tyler B. Schlimme (daf)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2022 is VACATED. Initial Disclosures due by 4/30/2022; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 6/1/2022; Discovery due by 11/1/2022; Dispositive motions due by 12/31/2022; Primary Expert due by 11/15/2022; Rebuttal Expert due by 12/15/2022; Settlement Demand due by 9/1/2022; Response to Settlement Demand due by 9/15/2022; Case is referred to Mediation in 10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/6/2022. (kk2)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Defendant Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit) (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 7
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendants and by Plaintiff Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc.. (Dortch, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service) (Dortch, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2022 11:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTATION ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - due by 4/7/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/14/22. (jr)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT filed originally in Washington County Court of Common Pleas on 12/2/2021 by Grimm Scientific Industries, Inc. against Foam Supplies, Inc. & James Underwood. (er)
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Foam Supplies, Inc. answer due 4/7/2022. (jr)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 4/7/2022. by Defendant Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Nicholas, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington Common Pleas, case number 21OT000238 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8767861), filed by Foam Supplies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Complaint State Court, #4 Foam Return of Service, #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint) (Nicholas, Joseph) (Attachments 1-5 replaced on 3/14/2022- counsel must flatten documents and make each searchable before filing) (er).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
