Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co, Ltd. v. CPIC Automotive, Inc., et al.
Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. |
CPIC Automotive, Inc., Thomas S. Miller and Cameron G. Cofer |
2:2022cv01864 |
April 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Algenon L Marbley |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: The Clerk of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint via certified mail on May 26, 2022 to the following Defendant(s): THOMAS S. MILLER, 7021 0350 0001 6037 3130. (tla) |
Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Thomas S. Miller. (vb) |
Filing 12 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Cameron G. Cofer. Cameron G. Cofer served on 5/16/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. (tla) |
Filing 10 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Thomas S. Miller. (vb) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: The Clerk of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint via certified mail on May 12, 2022 to the following Defendant(s): CAMERON G. COFER, 7021 0350 0001 6037 3062; THOMAS S. MILLER, 7021 0350 0001 6037 3086; CPIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC., c/o Cameron G. Cofer, Statutory Agent, 7021 0350 0001 6037 3079. (jlk) |
Filing 8 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co., Ltd.. . (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to CPIC Automotive, Inc., Cameron G. Cofer, Thomas S. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Thomas Miller, #2 Summons Form CPIC Automotive, Inc.) (jlk) |
Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint filed by Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint, filed by Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co., Ltd. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 4/4/2022. (jlk) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff SHANGHAI GUOBO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CO., LTD.. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Friesen, Brendon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against CPIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Cameron G. Cofer, Thomas S. Miller ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8802804), filed by SHANGHAI GUOBO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CO., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Purchase Order 1, #2 Exhibit Purchase Order 2, #3 Exhibit Purchase Order 3, #4 Exhibit Purchase Order 4, #5 Exhibit Purchase Order 5, #6 Exhibit Purchase Order 6, #7 Exhibit Purchase Order 7, #8 Exhibit Purchase Order 8, #9 Exhibit Purchase Order 9, #10 Exhibit Invoice A, #11 Exhibit Invoice B, #12 Exhibit Invoice C, #13 Exhibit Invoice D, #14 Exhibit Invoice E, #15 Exhibit Invoice F, #16 Exhibit Invoice G, #17 Exhibit Invoice H, #18 Exhibit Invoice I, #19 Exhibit Invoice J, #20 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Shhet, #21 Summons Form Summons to CPIC, #22 Summons Form Summons to Miller, #23 Summons Form Summons to Cofer) (Friesen, Brendon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.