Labella v. The Procter & Gamble Company
| Lindsey Labella |
| The Procter & Gamble Company |
| 2:2022cv01992 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Michael H Watson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTATION ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jonathan M. Jagher. PHV Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/27/2022. (er)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jonathan M. Jagher by Plaintiff Lindsey Labella. (er) |
|
Filing 13
NOTATION ORDER finding as moot #12 Motion for Protective Order. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/20/2022. (agm)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order with EXHIBIT A - Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. Associated Cases: 2:22-md-03025-MHW-CMV et al. (Soukup, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Western; Case Number 3:21-cv-00216. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura added. (er) |
| Filing 10 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order received from Southern District of Ohio. (lar) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Joint Motion to Stay. This case is stayed pending the decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in In re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 3025. All deadlines, including Defendant's obligation to respond to the Complaint are hereby vacated. If the JPML does not centralize these cases, the Parties shall file a status report within 14 days of the JPML's ruling. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 1/13/2022. (dlg) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.]
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Stay) (Singley, David) Modified text on 1/13/2022 to correct title. (lar) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. (Singley, David) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transfer Case by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion for Transfer of Actions, #2 Exhibit Brief in Support of Defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company's Motion for Transfer of Actions, #3 Exhibit Schedule of Actions, #4 Exhibit Defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company's Notice of Related Actions, #5 Exhibit Schedule of Additional Related Actions) (Singley, David) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LINDSEY LABELLA. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY waiver sent on 12/20/2021, answer due 2/18/2022. (Lynch, Gary) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order) Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 12/20/2021. (dag) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dag) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (lar) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6861068), filed by LINDSEY LABELLA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lar) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/20/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Labella v. The Procter & Gamble Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lindsey Labella | |
| Represented By: | Gary F Lynch |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Marc Jagher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company | |
| Represented By: | David J. Singley |
| Represented By: | Amy S. Heath |
| Represented By: | Andrew Soukup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
