Johnson v. Lavender et al
| Andrew Lee Johnson |
| George W Lavender, Jr., Ross County Sheriff's Department, Rebecca Hall, Andrew Campbell and Brenton Davidson |
| 2:2022cv02212 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. Signed Amended Complaint. (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Service of Process by US Marshal (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Andrew Campbell, Brenton Davidson, Rebecca Hall, George W Lavender Jr, and Ross County Sheriff's Department (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Davidson, #2 Summons Form Hall, #3 Summons Form Ross County, #4 Summons Form Lavender) (kk2) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wants the Court to effect service, he is DIRECTED to submit Marshal service forms for each defendant w/in fourteen (14) days. If Plaintiff is completing service on his own, it must be complete w/in ninety (90) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/8/2022. (kk2)
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form) (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. . (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. . (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form) (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 9 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint filed by Andrew Lee Johnson, #7 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Andrew Lee Johnson., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint filed by Andrew Lee Johnson, #7 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Andrew Lee Johnson. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 5/23/2022. (daf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Andrew Lee Johnson. (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Sheriff Lavender (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Ross Co Sheriff Department (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Deput Hall (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Deputy Davidson (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Howard, Elisabeth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND Andrew Lee Johnson against All Defendants, filed by Andrew Lee Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit IFP) (Howard, Elisabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
