Poindexter v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
| Jaquon L Poindexter |
| Warden Ross Correctional Institution |
| 2:2022cv02441 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Lamb for Respondent Warden Ross Correctional Institution (Lamb, William) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Respondent shall file an answer w/in sixty (60) days; Petitioner may file and serve a Traverse twenty-one (21) days thereafter. Warden Ross Correctional Institution answer due 8/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/27/2022. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Jaquon L Poindexter on 6/15/2022 re returned check #99389 in the amount of $7 (kk2) |
| Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 200COL069982 (daf) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees w/in thirty (30) days. Deficiency Deadline due by 7/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/13/2022. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: The Court, upon a review of the record, notes that the above-styled case was erroneously filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Cincinnati. Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1(b), this case is hereby transferred to the Eastern Division at Columbus for reassignment to another district judge. This case shall be closed on the undersigneds docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 06/10/2022. (kaf) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred in from Western Division at Cincinnati on 06/10/2022. Case Number 1:22-cv-330. Case assigned to Judge Sarah D. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (kaf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jaquon L Poindexter. Attachment: #1 envelope) (vb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Poindexter v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jaquon L Poindexter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Ross Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | William H Lamb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
