Brown v. Chambers-Smith et al
| Milous Brown |
| Annette Chambers-Smith, Ernie L Moore, Brian J Niceswanger, Jondrea K Parrish, Jocelyn K Lowe, A Moon, David Gray, Marc Bratton, Suzanne Evans, Patrick Haley, Denise Henry, Derek Winland and Interested Party State of Ohio |
| 2:2022cv02469 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Michael R Merz |
| Peter B Silvain |
| Michael H Watson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Annette Chambers-Smith. (bjr)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER adopting #9 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/3/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Marcy Ann Vonderwell for Defendant Interested Party State of Ohio (Vonderwell, Marcy)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to Annette Chambers-Smith. (pb)
|
|
Filing 9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS;ORDER It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Complaint herein be dismissed insofar as it seeks monetary damages against any Defendant in his or her official capacity or injunctive relief to enforce any provision of Ohio law against any Defendant re #7 Complaint filed by Milous Brown; Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk issue process and a copy of the Complaint directed to Defendant Annette Chambers Smith and deliver it to the United States Marshal to make service and due return. The Clerk need not provide the Marshal with service copies of other filings in the case which will be available online to the assistant Attorney General assigned to the case. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2022), ORDER -. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/13/22. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification, along with the order to deliver it to the United States Marshal to make service and due return of a copy of the Complaint directed to Defendant Annette Chambers Smith at Annette Chamber-Smith Director Ohio Depart o Rehab and Corr 770 W. Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMARY OF STATUS; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - It appears to the undersigned that these two cases involve common issues of law and fact and thus are subject to consolidation under Fed.R.Civ.P. 42. It is accordingly ORDERED that not later than August 1, 2022, the parties show cause why these cases should not be consolidated. Although Defendants have not had counsel enter an appearance yet in Milous Brown II, the Court assumes that the Assistant Attorneys General assigned by Milous Brown I can respond on behalf of the Attorney General or cause an assignment to be made. Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel in Milous Brown II. The Court respectfully requests Attorney Boruchowitz to consider acceptance of appointment in that case as well, also for purposes of mediation. Show Cause Response due by 8/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/6/2022. (bjr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 7
COMPLAINT against Marc Bratton, Annette Chambers-Smith, Suzanne Evans, David Gray, Patrick Haley, Denise Henry, Jocelyn K Lowe, A Moon, Ernie L Moore, Brian J Niceswanger, Jondrea K Parrish, Derek Winland, filed by Milous Brown. (pb)
|
|
Filing 6
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $ 57.49 (20 percent of average monthly deposits/20 percent of average monthly balance). The incarcerating institution is ORDERED to forward from plaintiff's prison account to the Clerk of Court located in Dayton, Ohio, the initial partial filing fee assessed against plaintiff forthwith. Thereafter, the incarcerating institution is ORDERED to forward to the Clerk of Court located in Dayton, Ohio, monthly payments of 20 percent of plaintiff's preceding month's income credited to his or her prison account each time the amount in plaintiff's accounts exceeds $10.00 until the full amount of the filing fee ($400.00) is paid. The prisoner's name and case number must be noted on each remittance.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/29/22. (pb)(This document and Orders to the clerk has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2022: #1 Summons Form, #2 USM 285 Forms) (pb).
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:19-cv-2425 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/29/2022. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Milous Brown. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Milous Brown. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Milous Brown. (Attachments: #1 complaint.) (jlk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
