Christianson v. Harper Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Dr. David C. Christianson
Defendant: Harper Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv02991
Filed: August 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 10/14/2022. DR. DAVID CHRISTIANSONS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO HARPER HOLDINGS, LLCS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION OF DR. DAVID CHRISTIANON TO REDUCE THE ARBITRATION AWARD TO JUDGMENT by Plaintiff David C. Christianson. (Attachments: #1 Order Granting Dr. Christianson's Motion for Extension of Time) (Teetor, Matthew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 BRIEF by Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC. (Mattes, William)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint,, , #10 MOTION to Vacate MOTION OF DR. DAVID CHRISTIANSON TO REDUCE THE ARBITRATION AWARD TO JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HARPER HOLDINGS MOTIONS TO VACATE, MODIFY, CORRECT, AND STRIKE filed by Plaintiff David C. Christianson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Post-Hearing Brief of Claimant Dr. David Christianson, #2 Exhibit B - Respondent Harper Holdings, LLCs Post-Hearing Brief, #3 Exhibit C - Respondent Harper Holdings, LLCs Motion for Modification of Award, #4 Exhibit D - Claimant Dr. David Christiansons Response in Opposition io Respondents Motion to Change Its Award, #5 Exhibit E - Panel Opinion in Response to Respondents Motion to Change Award, #6 Exhibit F AAA Transmitting Award and Case Closure) (Teetor, Matthew)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC. (Mattes, William)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Vacate by Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Correspondence (Nov. 24, 2021), #2 Exhibit B - Subpoenas, #3 Exhibit C - Defendant Correspondence (Oct. 21, 2021)) (Burns, Justin)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brady Robert Wilson for Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC (Wilson, Brady)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William M Mattes for Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC (Mattes, William)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC. (Burns, Justin)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Michael Burns for Defendant Harper Holdings, LLC (Burns, Justin)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTATION ORDER granting #4 DR. DAVID CHRISTIANSON'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO HARPER HOLDINGS, LLC'S MOTION TO VACATE, MODIFY OR CORRECT AN ARBITRATION AWARD. Response due by 9/9/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/15/22. (jr)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply New date requested 9/9/2022. DR. DAVID CHRISTIANSONS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO HARPER HOLDINGS, LLCS MOTION TO VACATE, MODIFY OR CORRECT AN ARBITRATION AWARD by Plaintiff David C. Christianson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Dr. Christianson's Motion for Extension of Time, #2 Exhibit A - Email Between Parties re No Objection to Extension) (Teetor, Matthew)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: Judge Watson has determined that this case and case number 2:22-cv-3031 ARE related. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/9/2022. (er)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David C. Christianson ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8983031), filed by David C. Christianson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Harper Holdings Articles of Incorporation, #2 Exhibit B - Membership Purchase Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Employment Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Christianson AAA Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - Sarah Cole Notice of Appointment, #6 Exhibit F - Welin Huston Appointment, #7 Exhibit G - AAA Opinion and Final Award, #8 Exhibit H - AAA Panel Opinion re Motion to Change Award, #9 Exhibit Proposed Order and Judgment Entry Confirming Award of Arbitration, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons Form Waiver of the Service of Summons) (Teetor, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christianson v. Harper Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. David C. Christianson
Represented By: Matthew Stephen Teetor
Represented By: John Stephen Teetor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harper Holdings, LLC
Represented By: William M Mattes
Represented By: Brady Robert Wilson
Represented By: Justin Michael Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?