Winter v. U.S. Bank
Steven Winter |
U.S. Bank |
2:2022cv03184 |
August 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Sarah D Morrison |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay Deadlines filed by the parties. (ECF No. #7 .) For good cause shown, the Request is GRANTED. This case is hereby STAYED for SIXTY (60) DAYS. The parties are DIRECTED to file a JOINT STATUS REPORT detailing the status, but not the substance, of their settlement efforts for this case by NOVEMBER 14, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 09/15/2022. (tla)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST TO STAY DEADLINES by Defendant U.S. Bank (Teetor, Matthew) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION Stipulation for Extension of Time (Agreed) by Defendant U.S. Bank. (Teetor, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing:Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/20/2022 11:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against U.S. Bank, filed by Steven Winter. (tla) |
Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT re #1 by Defendant U.S. Bank. Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Franklin County Common Pleas Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - FCCP Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Teetor, Matthew) Modified text on 8/22/2022 (tla). |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Notice of Removal, filed by U.S. Bank., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 as a text searchable document(s) using the AMENDED DOCUMENT filing event, linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 8/23/2022. (tla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Common Pleas, case number 22CV004873 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9012342), filed by U.S. Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Franklin County Common Pleas Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - FCCP Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Teetor, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Winter v. U.S. Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven Winter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Bank | |
Represented By: | Matthew Stephen Teetor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.