Rogers et al v. Restore Contracting, Inc. et al
| Jon Rogers and Monica Rogers |
| Restore Contracting, Inc., Kevin Jarvis and GAF Materials, LLC |
| 2:2022cv03231 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Michael H Watson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #2 Complaint filed by GAF Materials, LLC. (McPeek, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Change of Address by Bradley D McPeek (McPeek, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory S. Zuchowski for Plaintiffs Jon Rogers, Monica Rogers (Zuchowski, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 3
STIPULATION Extending Time to Plead, Answer, or Otherwise Defend by Defendant GAF Materials, LLC. (McPeek, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against GAF Materials, LLC, Kevin Jarvis, Restore Contracting, Inc., filed by Jon Rogers, Monica Rogers. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas, case number 22CV241 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9020188), filed by GAF Materials, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A State Case Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Consent to Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (McPeek, Bradley)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
