Lahey v. Lahey
Timothy P. Lahey |
Dennis William Lahey |
2:2022cv03470 |
September 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Michael H Watson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER - To whatever extent the statement is an objection to the R&R ECF No. 9, it is OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/14/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 9 Statement by Plaintiff Timothy P. Lahey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tla) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the November 9, 2022 Order, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 ORDER adopting #5 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/9/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Timothy P. Lahey re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tla) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Timothy P. Lahey. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. Furthermore, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 10/21/2022. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
This entry is for statistical purposes only. See ECF No. #5 for the document. (daf) |
Filing 4 Statement Due by Plaintiff Timothy P. Lahey (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tla) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy P. Lahey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
Filing 2 ORDER and NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $402.00 filing fee within THIRTY DAYS. Alternatively, Plaintiff may submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 1915(a), submitting the required affidavit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/27/2022. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dennis William Lahey, filed by Timothy P. Lahey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lahey v. Lahey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy P. Lahey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dennis William Lahey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.