Norman v. RK Holdings, LLP et al.
| Brian Norman |
| Rural King C, Inc., Shaun Amrine and RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King |
| 2:2022cv03704 |
| October 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the following schedule: Joinder of Parties due by 3/16/2023. Motions to Amend due by 3/16/2023. Initial Disclosures due by 2/16/2023. Discovery due by 10/16/2023. Clawback Agreement Deadline due by 1/16/2023. Dispositive motions due by 12/18/2023. Primary Expert due by 8/16/2023. Rebuttal Expert due by 9/18/2023. Settlement Demand due by 3/16/2023. Response to Settlement Demand due by 4/17/2023. Mediation Deadline: 10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on December 1, 2022. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 13
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant RK Holdings, LLP. (Wiley, Craig)
|
|
NOTICE : The PPTC set for 12/6/2022 is VACATED. (See ECF No. #12 .) (sln)
|
|
Filing 12
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendants Shaun Amrine, RK Holdings, LLP. (Wiley, Craig)
|
|
Filing 11
Defendants' ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint filed by Shaun Amrine, RK Holdings, LLP. (Wiley, Craig)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTATION ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig W. Wiley as co-counsel; granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Cheyna H. Galloway as co-counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on November 7, 2022. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9128865) of Cheyna H. Galloway by Defendants Shaun Amrine, RK Holdings, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Martin, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9128835) of Craig W. Wiley by Defendants Shaun Amrine, RK Holdings, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Martin, Ryan)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Shaun Amrine answer due 11/28/2022; RK Holdings, LLP answer due 11/28/2022. (jlk)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Hearing:Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2022 11:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint (New Date 11/28/2022) by Defendants Shaun Amrine, RK Holdings, LLP. (Martin, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED DOCUMENT Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Brian Norman . (Walczak Music, Lisa) Modified text on 11/7/2022 (jlk).
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brian Norman. (Walczak Music, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Plaintiff Brian Norman Civil Cover Sheet (Walczak Music, Lisa) Modified text on 11/7/2022 (jlk).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE Right to Sue Letter by Plaintiff Brian Norman re #1 Complaint (Walczak Music, Lisa) Modified text on 10/17/2022 (jlk).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9091578), filed by Brian Norman. (Walczak Music, Lisa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
