Shatku v. Davol, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Myquerem Shatku
Defendant: Davol, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc and Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv03791
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc, and Davol, Inc. (daf)
November 29, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form) (McGoldrick, Marilyn)
November 21, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc, Davol, Inc. (er)
November 15, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form) (McGoldrick, Marilyn)
November 3, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Myquerem Shatku re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (McGoldrick, Marilyn)
November 3, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc, Davol, Inc, filed by Myquerem Shatku. (McGoldrick, Marilyn)
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint, filed by Myquerem Shatku., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint, filed by Myquerem Shatku. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 10/27/2022. (daf)
October 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc, Davol, Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9108735), filed by Myquerem Shatku. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (McGoldrick, Marilyn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shatku v. Davol, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Myquerem Shatku
Represented By: Marilyn Theresa McGoldrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davol, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Becton Dickinson Enterprises Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?