United States of America v. Amsted Rail Company
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Amsted Rail Company
Case Number: 2:2022cv03795
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9169077) of Frank R. Volpe by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certificate of Good Standing)) (King, James)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER granting #17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Frank R. Volpe as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. By Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/06/2022. (tla)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Continue. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference previously scheduled for December 1, 2022 is hereby VACATED and CONTINUED until JANUARY 26, 2023 at 11:00 A.M. The parties are directed to call 1-877-336-1280, enter access code 7598806#, followed by security code 1234#. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on November 17, 2022. (jlk)
November 16, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION to Continue Preliminary Pretrial Conference (Agreed Motion) by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (King, James)
November 16, 2022 Filing 14 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (King, James)
November 1, 2022 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Amsted Rail Company on 10/25/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Jones, Lila)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTATION ORDER granting #4 , #5 , #6 , #7 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David T. Buente, Jr., Mackenzie Siebert Ehrett, Andrew R. Stewart and Samuel B. Boxerman. PHV Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 11/1/2022. (er)
November 1, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Defendant Amsted Rail Company re #10 Notice of Deficiency (Clerk's Notice), #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116758) of David T. Buente Jr. (King, James)
October 31, 2022 Filing 10 Notice of Deficiency re: The motion does not contain certificate of good standing. Related Document: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116758) of David T. Buente Jr. filed by Amsted Rail Company. Deficiency Deadline by 11/14/2022. (er)
October 31, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas A. Benson for Plaintiff United States of America (Benson, Thomas)
October 31, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing:Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2022 11:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln)
October 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116791) of Mackenzie Siebert Ehrett by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certificate of Good Standing)) (King, James)
October 28, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116778) of Andrew R. Stewart by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certificate of Good Standing)) (King, James)
October 28, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116769) of Samuel B. Boxerman by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certificate of Good Standing)) (King, James)
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9116758) of David T. Buente Jr. by Defendant Amsted Rail Company. (King, James)
October 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James A King for Defendant Amsted Rail Company (King, James)
October 28, 2022 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE to Counsel. (er)
October 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amsted Rail Company, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jones, Lila)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Amsted Rail Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Andrew M Malek
Represented By: Lila Jones
Represented By: Thomas A. Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amsted Rail Company
Represented By: Mackenzie Siebert Ehrett
Represented By: Samuel B. Boxerman
Represented By: James A King
Represented By: Andrew R. Stewart
Represented By: David T Buente
Represented By: Eric Benjamin Gallon
Represented By: Frank R. Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?