Doe v. Fairfield Medical Center
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Fairfield Medical Center
Case Number: 2:2022cv03919
Filed: November 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #6 Notice of Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/6/2023. (vb)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Fairfield Medical Center answer due 1/27/2023. (daf)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Fairfield Medical Center. (Squillante, Sarah)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Dominick Alexander Kocak for Plaintiff Jane Doe (Kocak, Dominick)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson: Status Conference held on 12/12/2022. (jr)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION To Proceed Anonymously filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Sabo-Friedmann, Rachel)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION To Proceed Anonymously Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously filed by Defendant Fairfield Medical Center. (Squillante, Sarah)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 1/10/2023 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION To Proceed Anonymously by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Sabo-Friedmann, Rachel)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Fairfield Medical Center on 11/7/2022, answer due 1/6/2023. (Sabo-Friedmann, Rachel)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John Michael Stephen for Defendant Fairfield Medical Center (Stephen, John)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah K. Squillante for Defendant Fairfield Medical Center (Squillante, Sarah)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Fairfield Medical Center ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9129315), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Sabo-Friedmann, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Fairfield Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Rachel Sabo-Friedmann
Represented By: Peter Friedmann
Represented By: Dominick Alexander Kocak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fairfield Medical Center
Represented By: John Michael Stephen
Represented By: Sarah K. Squillante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?