Martin v. The State Of Ohio
Petitioner: Howard E. Martin, III
Respondent: The State Of Ohio and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number: 2:2022cv04423
Filed: December 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Referring Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Filing fee received: $5 Receipt Number 200002054. (vb)
February 15, 2023 Filing 6 Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Howard E. Martin, III. (kh)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SECOND DEFICIENCY ORDER - Petitioner is again ORDERED to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Second Deficiency Order. He is also ORDERED to submit to the Court an Amended Petition, using the appropriate standard form, setting out his grounds for relief and the other required information. The Amended Petition must name a proper respondent over which this Court would have jurisdiction and upon which this Court could order service. The Amended Petition must be submitted WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Second Deficiency Order. Petitioner is ADVISED that failure to comply with this Second Deficiency Order will result in the dismissal of this action for want of prosecution and/or failure to comply with the Court's orders.Finally, Petitioner is again DIRECTED not to submit further documents in this case with a decorative border around the top margin, as it obscures the Court's filing information. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/30/2023. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 17, 2023 Filing 4 AMENDED Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Howard E. Martin, III (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelopes 1 and 2) (kk2)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER - Petitioner is ORDERED to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Deficiency Order. Petitioner is ORDERED to submit to the Court an Amended Petition, using the appropriate standard form, setting out his grounds for relief and the other required information. The Amended Petition must be submitted WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Deficiency Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a blank copy of the following three documents: (1) the Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person To Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form, (2) the standard form for a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person in State Custody, and (3) the standard form for a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody (Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255). Petitioner is DIRECTED not to submit further documents in this case with a decorative border around the top margin, as it obscures the Courts filing information. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/22/2022. (kh) (This document and the three forms have been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 19, 2022 Filing 2 Supplemental Support Evidence by Petitioner Howard E. Martin, III re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Env.) (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 19, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Howard E. Martin, III. (daf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. The State Of Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Howard E. Martin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State Of Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?