Tolliver v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Case Number: |
2:2022cv04567 |
Filed: |
April 18, 2023 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Office: |
Columbus Office |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 13, 2024 |
Filing
25
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Order to Show Cause and Emergency Temporary Injunction/Restraining Order and adopting Report and affirming 18 Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 5/13/2024. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
February 28, 2024 |
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued in that it is RECOMMENDED that 15 Plaintiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause and Emergency Temporary Injunction/Restraining Order be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/28/24. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
February 16, 2024 |
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER - ADOPT AND AFFIRMING Report and Recommendations from the Magistrate Judge, one issued on April 18, 2023 (ECF No. 4 ) and the other on June 14, 2023 (ECF No. 9 ) and denying 7 Motion to Certify as Class Action. Signed by Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 2/16/2024. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
June 14, 2023 |
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DENY Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Certify as Class Action, including his request for appointment of counsel. As to the 8 Amended Complaint it is RECOMMENDED that the Court a) Dismiss all claims raised against the ODRC pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, b) Dismiss all claims raised on behalf of other Muslim inmates, as Plaintiff lacks standing to raise claims on their behalf, c) Dismiss Declarations 15-17 seeking a decl aration that religious groups of which Plaintiff is not a member deserve their own policies, d) Dismiss all claims raised under §1983 alleging that the ODRC policies were not followed as the violation of state policy is outside the scope of 7;1983, e) Allow the following claims to Proceed at this time, and subject to further order of Court: 1) The claim against the ODRC under RLUIPA and 2) The claims against Director Chambers-Smith, Defendants Davis and Urrah, and the John Doe and Jane Doe Defendants, under §1983, RLUIPA, and state law. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/14/2023. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
April 18, 2023 |
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by Kevin A. Tolliver: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DISMISS a) all claims against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections raised under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; b) all cl aims raised on behalf of other Muslim inmates; c) all claims raised on behalf of groups of which Plaintiff is not a member; d) all claims under § 1983 based on alleged violations of ODRC policy; and e) the claim alleging a denial of Halal or Kos her meals. The Court Should ALLOW the remaining claims to PROCEED at this time and the parties should be prepared to address the issues raised in Section III.F - III.H. Objections to R&R due by 5/2/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/17/2023. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?