Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. JPR Hospitality Inc, et al
Red Roof Franchising, LLC |
JPR HOSPITALITY, INC.,, JANANTIK N PANDYA, RITESH M VAIDYA and JPR Hospitality Inc |
2:2023cv00862 |
March 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Sarah D Morrison |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 5/19/2023. Joinder of Parties/Motions to Amend due by 8/18/2023. Discovery due by 10/27/2023. (If the parties are unable to reach an agreement on any matter related to discovery, they are directed to arrange a conference with the Court). Clawback Agreement Deadline due by 5/26/2023. Dispositive motions due by 11/24/2023. Primary Expert due by 10/27/2023. Rebuttal Expert due by 11/24/2023. Settlement Demand due by 6/23/2023. Response to Settlement Demand due by 7/7/2023. Mediation Deadline: 7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 4/28/2023. (vb) |
NOTICE: The Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2023 is VACATED. (See ECF No. #18 .) (sln) |
Filing 18 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Red Roof Franchising, LLC. (Mattingly, Natalie) |
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant JPR Hospitality Inc. (Holford, Andrew) |
Filing 16 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER with Jury Demand to #7 Amended Complaint filed by All Defendants. (Holford, Andrew) Modified on 4/28/2023 to add demand (kk2) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: JPR Hospitality Inc answer due 4/27/2023; Janantik N Pandya answer due 4/27/2023; Ritesh M Vaidya answer due 4/27/2023. (jlk) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Hearing:Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2023 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD by Defendants JPR Hospitality Inc, Janantik N Pandya, Ritesh M Vaidya. (Holford, Andrew) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Mills Holford for Defendants JPR Hospitality Inc, Janantik N Pandya, Ritesh M Vaidya (Holford, Andrew) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Janantik N Pandya. Janantik N Pandya served on 3/17/2023, answer due 4/7/2023. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ritesh M Vaidya. Ritesh M Vaidya served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Janantik N Pandya. Janantik N Pandya served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Red Roof Franchising, LLC. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Exhibits A through G Attached) against All Defendants, filed by Red Roof Franchising, LLC. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to JPR Hospitality Inc, Janantik N Pandya, Ritesh M Vaidya. (er) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Red Roof Franchising, LLC re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Mattingly, Natalie) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form) (Mattingly, Natalie) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Red Roof Franchising, LLC. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND Exhibits A - G Attached) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9298307), filed by Red Roof Franchising, LLC. (Brogdon, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.