Canter et al v. Omega Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
| Richard Canter and Kelly Basilio |
| Omega Healthcare Services, Inc. and Esther Bervelyn Acheampong |
| 2:2023cv01037 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Esther Bervelyn Acheampong, Omega Healthcare Services, Inc.. The named Defendants were served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. (daf) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons were sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (daf) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Esther Bervelyn Acheampong, Omega Healthcare Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form) (ds) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Acheampong (Contreras, Peter) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Omega Healthcare Services, Inc. (Contreras, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND for Violations of FLSA against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9333116), filed by Richard Canter, Kelly Basilio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consents to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Contreras, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
