Liening v. Davol, Inc. et al
Phillip Liening |
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. |
2:2023cv01251 |
April 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Edmund A Sargus |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Short Form ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc.. (Kloss, William) |
Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Phillip Liening. Short Form Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cutter, Curtis) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Liening., and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Liening. as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 4/11/2023. (daf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9358852), filed by Phillip Liening. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cutter, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.