Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amber L. Williams |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2023cv01647 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 8/16/2023. by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Julis, Rachel) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within SIXTY (60) DAYS after filing of the Social Security Identification Form required by Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1(a), which copy shall function as the answer. Plaintiff must file a statement of errors within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. The Commissioner must file and serve a memorandum in opposition to Plaintiff's statement of errors within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS after service of the statement of errors. Plaintiff's reply, if any, must be filed FIFTEEN (15) DAYS after the memorandum in opposition is filed. All briefing must include references to the administrative record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 05/18/2023. (tla)
|
| Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura added. (jmb) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 6/16/2023 (jmb) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9424852), filed by Amber L. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Farrell, Clifford) |
| Set Deadlines: Pursuant to 2 , Commissioner of Social Security shall file the electronic certified administrative record and answer or respond to the Complaint by 7/17/2023. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
