Cromartie v. Hale et al
| Alton Cromartie |
| Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and Marilyn Rodriguez |
| 2:2023cv01802 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| James L Graham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff, Alton Cromartie. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Demand Statement) (bjr) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to #3 Deficiency Order by Plaintiff, Alton Cromartie. (bjr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend Complaint, by Plaintiff Alton Cromartie. Attachments: #1 Exhibit 8-10, #2 envelope. (vb) |
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 6/9/2023. (srb)(This document along with an Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed against Arthur Hale, Ashley Orsbone, Marilyn Rodriguez, Mary Roush, filed by Alton Cromartie. Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exh 2, 2A, 2b, #3 Exh 3, #4 Exh 4, #5 Exh 6, 6a, #6 Exh 7, #7 envelope. (vb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Alton Cromartie. (vb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
