Prall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Todd Prall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2023cv02785
Filed: August 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 12/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 009 Medical Records Part 2) (Stark, John)
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: As no party has indicated on the previously issued #6 Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment pursuant to General Order 22-04. (jmb)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Extension to File Complaint; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Defendant must file and serve on Plaintiff a certified copy of the Administrative Record within 60 days after filing of the Social Security Identification form. Plaintiff must serve a Statement of Errors within 45 days after service of the administrative record. Defendant must serve and file a Memo in Opp to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors within 45 days. Plaintiff may file and serve a Reply Memo within 15 days thereafter. In cases decided by a Magistrate Judge upon the unanimous consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), appeals may be taken as provided by law. In cases in which the Magistrate Judge files a report and recommendations to a District Judge on the merits of the case, the time for filing objections and responses to objections is the fourteen-day period provided by 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, unless modified by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/28/2023. (er)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 9/27/2023 (jmb)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security shall file the electronic certified administrative record and answer or respond to the Complaint by 10/27/2023. (jmb)
August 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Todd Prall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Yocum, Mindy)
August 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Todd Prall. (Yocum, Mindy)
August 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File by Plaintiff Todd Prall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Yocum, Mindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd Prall
Represented By: Mindy Yocum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?