Pack v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sharon K. Pack
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2023cv03018
Filed: September 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2023 Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Statement of Errors due by 1/2/2024. (art)
November 15, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 2, #2 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 3, #3 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 4, #4 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 5, #5 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 6, #6 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 7, #7 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 8, #8 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 9, #9 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 10, #10 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 11, #11 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 12, #12 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 13, #13 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 14, #14 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 15, #15 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 16, #16 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 17, #17 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 18, #18 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 19, #19 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 20, #20 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 21, #21 Initial_CAR_Sentence_4_Part 22) (Stark, John)
September 26, 2023 Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz added. (jmb)
September 26, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb)
September 25, 2023 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Sharon K. Pack. (bjc)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - In accordance with Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1, the Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within SIXTY (60) DAYS after filing of the Social Security Identification Form and the Complaint as required by Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1(a), which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff must file a Statement of Errors within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. The Commissioner must file and serve a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Statement of Errors within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS after service of the Statement of Errors. Plaintiffs Reply, if any, must be filed FIFTEEN (15) DAYS after the memorandum in opposition is filed. All briefing must include references to the administrative record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 09/22/2023. (bjc)
September 25, 2023 Set Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 11/24/2023. (bjc)
September 21, 2023 Filing 4 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 10/23/2023 (bjc)
September 21, 2023 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (bjc)
September 20, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sharon K. Pack. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Farrell, Clifford)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pack v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon K. Pack
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?