Brooks et al v. Peoples Bank
Latasha Brooks and Michael Brooks |
Peoples Bank |
2:2023cv03043 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Michael H Watson |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:23-cv-3161 are related. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley, Judge Michael H. Watson, and Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 11/14/2023. (kk2) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Chief Judge has determined that this case and case number 2:23-cv-3084, 2:23-cv-3043 and 1:23-cv-603 ARE related. 2:23-cv-3084 reassigned to Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on September 28, 2023. (jlk) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Peoples Bank on 9/25/2023, answer due 11/24/2023. (Coates, Terence) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Peoples Bank. (mas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Peoples Bank ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9611281), filed by Latasha Brooks, Michael Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Coates, Terence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.